Select Page

33 Years Served…So What if you're a Jerk?

Ok, so I was on my way today to pick up my son from school.  In the back was my little daughter angelicly sleeping.  Thinking nice thoughts and anticipating the glee from my son when I pick him up, then WHAM! this friggin’ huge white Ford F150, could’ve been a 250 even and cut me off for no freaking apparent reason.  Before I could flip him the birdy I saw proudly displayed on the back of his truck….I serve my Country for 33 Years.

Hmmm….33 years…normally, I would give props, but his friggin jerk just headed me off.  Not only did he disrupt my nice thoughts, he jepoardize my life, my little baby.  I was ready to go head to head and rip this old vet a new….youknowwhatamean.  Anyway, the momentary thought to annihilate the bast##@@ left as quickly as it came.  I continue on and regain caught back up to my thought a few chains down the road.  But I can’t help imagining how warp that 33 years serving bonehead must be.

Robot car: streets ahead in cities of the future

· Architects and engineers rethink auto technology
· ‘Easy to drive, stackable vehicle for people to share’
   
Alok Jha, science correspondent, Thursday December 29, 2005

It is not every day that a concept car re-writes the rules of more than 100 years of motoring. In development for four years by a team of architects and engineers led by William Mitchell, former head of the school of architecture at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), as part of his Smart Cities research group, a new MIT car is borne of a complete rethink of people’s relationship with their cars in the ever-expanding cities of the future.Prof Mitchell expects we will share cars that will be easier to drive in congested cities, will be pollution-free and can be customised at will. The MIT Smart Cities research team's car. Image: Franco Vairani/MIT Department of Architecture 

  

The city car concept, with styling input by architect Frank Gehry, will be completed and delivered by MIT to General Motors early next year.

“Primarily we’re interested in urban living,” says Ryan Chin, an architect and engineer at MIT’s media lab and a member of Prof Mitchell’s research group. “Everything scales down from what we think the city of the future is.”

The Smart Cities group focused on how cars could be better adapted to get round familiar problems of city life, namely congestion, pollution and parking. Motor companies are well aware of the issue. But the group felt the companies had missed the point, even with city cars such as the Smart, the iconic two-passenger cars introduced by Swatch and Mercedes in 1998.

“We have to think of city cars as not just small-footprint vehicles that can squeeze into tight spaces but ones that can work in unison and also be almost like a parasite that leeches on to mass-transit systems,” says Mr Chin. While Smart changed the way people think about parking and size, the MIT engineers felt that, as it had not been widely adopted and congestion and pollution problems had got no better, its success had been limited.

So the MIT team started from scratch to come up with their own concept: a stackable, shareable, electric, two-passenger car. “Imagine a shopping cart – a vehicle that can stack – you can take the first vehicle out of a stack and off you go,” says Mr Chin. “These stacks would be placed throughout the city. A good place would be outside a subway station or a bus line or an airport, places where there’s a convergence of transportation lines and people.”

The precedent for this type of shared personal transport is demonstrated with bicycle-sharing schemes in European towns and the ZipCar and FlexCar projects on the east and west coasts of the US respectively.

The MIT concept car is a complete re-think of vehicle technology. For a start, there is no engine, at least in the traditional sense. The power comes from devices called wheel robots. “These are self-contained wheel units that have electric motors inside,” says Mr Chin. “The interesting thing is that the wheel can turn a full 360 degrees so you can have omni-directional wheel movements. You can rotate the car while you’re moving, any direction can be front or back and you can do things like crabbing or translate sideways. It’s almost like you imagine yourself driving a computer chair.”

The wheel robots, complete with their own suspension, remove the need for a drive shaft and even the engine block, freeing up designers to make new use of the space in the car.

“Essentially the car will comprise four wheel-robots plus a customisable chassis,” says Chin. “The frame can be built specifically for each customer.”

Add wafer-thin, programmable displays that cover the interior and exterior of the car like a layer of paint, and you have a vehicle that can be customised at will. “You can imagine signalling being not just a static signal light but something more dynamic,” says Mr Chin, who suggests the words “reversing” or “turning left” could roll across the car’s body to declare the driver’s intentions. “From a heating and cooling point of view, you might want your car to be darker or lighter depending on weather. On the interior, you can customise your dashboard for each person. If I’m an elderly person, I probably want a very large speedometer so I can see it; if I’m a race-car driver, maybe all I want is a tachometer.”

The close proximity of cars in cities increases the risk of accidents, and the MIT car has a host of radical ideas to deal with this problem. Chief safety features include responsive seats that do away with the need for seat belts and air bags: these are based around a spine at the back of the seat with a number of “fingers” to embrace a passenger and hold them in place if the car detects that it is involved in an accident. And the cabin would absorb the impacts of crashes using new materials. “There is a new development in fluids that can be magnetised so that they move from liquid to solid state within a nanosecond. You can imagine using these fluids as a way of absorbing energy in an impact.”

Over the next few months the MIT team will complete the final design and present their results to General Motors, which will build the first prototype. Beyond that, Mr Chin is already trying to arrange a public test in the Far East. “We might do this in Hong Kong or in Singapore,” he says. “The interest in those places is that they are very dense, have mass transit and limited range. An island like Hong Kong would be a perfect place to test this because you have all those conditions.”

Whether the city car concept appears on garage forecourts as designed by the Smart Cities group or whether the technologies are taken forward individually remains to be seen. Chin says the group would be happy with either outcome.

   

    

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure of Success

Success is not measure do much by the position that one has reached in life as by the obstacles one has to overcome while trying to succeed.

Christmas Trip

Just got back from the Allstar Sports Resort at Walt Disney World where I spent three days and three nights with the family. It was really a blast. We left Ocala at around 3 p.m. on the 24th and got to Walt Disney at around 5:30 pm. We got something to eat real quickly at the cafeteria on the premises and then went back to our rooms to relax for the night to get ready for the next day.

Marcus and Cheyenne were all giggly and giddy from the anticipation of seeing Mickey Mouse and all the other Disney stuff. We barely slept that night, in fact, we got up at about 4 a.m. because Cheyenne messed with the clock.

We left the hotel at around 10am on Christmas day for the Magic Kingdom theme park. We got to the park at about 11 o’clock. The day started off rainy and cold, but about an hour in, it dried up and the sun came out.

We visited several areas of the theme park. Marcus and Cheyenne got their faces painted – Marcus was a Tiger and Cheyenne was Minnie mouse. They both looked great. We then bought ice cream cakes, rode the carousel, watched several parades, ate pizza, walked around the park ,visited several places again, rode a couple more rides, watched the highlight of the day – the fireworks, and finally a night parade. We got home after midnight.

The next day we had breakfast and left for MGM Studios Theme Park at about 9 a.m. While the celebration the day before at Magic Kingdom was great, we did not get a chance to ride as many rides in as we wanted – it was just too crowded. The following day, however, at MGM studio theme park, it was quite the opposite. We were able to get on most of the rides without much delay. The most memorable event of the day for me was Fantasmic. It was a water show that brought together all the good and evil characters from Disney productions. It was especially memorable to me because it was at night; it was cold; and I had my family all together in one place. It was beautiful and simply magical.

We got home from MGM at around nine o’clock the second day. We stopped in the cafeteria got some hot chocolate and then went up to our rooms. We chilled out for the night, got up the next day, hang out for a while at the resort, took some pictures and then got on the way back to Ocala.